Sean “Diddy” Combs continues to confront previous allegations about conspiracy in Tupac Shakur’s 1996 homicide, claims which sources near the investigation dismiss as baseless.
These near the continuing trial of Duane “Keefe D” Davis have blasted a brand new report from the U.S. Solar claiming that Diddy ordered the assassination of Tupac Shakur.
In accordance with the story, Diddy was implicated in new courtroom paperwork for allegedly paying $1 million to Davis, who was arrested final yr in connection to the killing. Nonetheless, a supply carefully concerned within the investigation disputes these new allegations, sustaining that no new proof has been introduced and that there’s no ongoing inquiry implicating Diddy.
The nameless supply claims “any suggestion of an indictment for Mr. Combs is irresponsible and unfounded.”
Diddy has by no means been a suspect and the latest claims are seen as inconsistent and missing in credibility. The supply added, “The notion that prosecutors have proof that Diddy paid Davis is categorically false and defamatory.”
Nonetheless, claims in opposition to Diddy have resurfaced periodically through the years. After a 2008 Los Angeles Instances article implicating him—which was later retracted because of unreliable sources and faux FBI paperwork—Diddy emphatically denied he had something to do with the homicide.
“This story is past ridiculous and utterly false,” Diddy beforehand instructed AllHipHop‘s Grouchy Greg Watkins. “Neither Biggie nor I had any information of any assault earlier than, throughout or after it occurred. It’s a full deceive counsel that there was any involvement by Biggie or myself.”
The persistent rumors are seen as makes an attempt to tarnish Diddy’s fame quite than deliver new details to mild.
“There isn’t any new or lively investigation involving Mr. Combs, and these allegations have been completely debunked over the previous three a long time,” the supply emphasised.
The accusations in opposition to Diddy stem largely from the statements of Davis, who has a protracted historical past of discussing his legal actions, together with in a 2009 police interview. His reliability as a witness has usually been referred to as into query.
