Mary J. Blige was blocked from transferring Misa Hylton’s $5 million lawsuit to a enterprise courtroom after a decide dominated the case belongs in civil courtroom.
Mary J. Blige’s try and switch a $5 million lawsuit filed by Misa Hylton to a New York courtroom that handles complicated enterprise disputes failed as a decide dominated the case didn’t meet the necessities for the specialised venue.
Blige’s authorized staff argued the case, centered on allegations that she interfered with Hylton’s administration deal involving rapper Vado, was too intricate for normal civil courtroom.
They claimed the lawsuit concerned “complicated” points equivalent to California legislation, contract enforcement and company standing.
Nonetheless, Decide Suzanne J. Adams rejected the movement, stating that the claims had been tied to leisure and artist administration agreements, not the kind of industrial dealings the courtroom’s Business Division was designed to deal with.
In her ruling, Adams wrote that “the complexity of the case, the selection of legislation points, and the quantity in controversy don’t warrant switch to the Business Division.”
The lawsuit, filed in April 2025, accuses Mary J. Blige of pressuring Vado to desert his settlement with Hylton’s M.I.S.A. Administration in favor of signing with Blige’s label, Lovely Life Productions.
Hylton alleges Blige withheld album releases and touring alternatives from Vado except he minimize ties together with her.
Hylton is searching for $5 million in damages, in addition to an injunction to stop Blige from interfering in future enterprise relationships.
The criticism additionally names Blige’s head of safety, whom Hylton claims is her boyfriend, and accuses him of warning Vado that he’d “lose out on alternatives” if he stayed with Hylton.
Blige has dismissed the claims as “patently frivolous” and “meritless,” suggesting the lawsuit is a private assault designed to drive a settlement.
Her attorneys argue that Hylton’s firm is just not a legitimate company and that she lacks the correct licensing to function as a expertise agent.
Blige can also be searching for sanctions in opposition to Hylton and her lawyer, alleging the swimsuit was filed for publicity and leverage.
Hylton’s lawyer stated they tried to resolve the dispute privately, however turned to the courts when Blige’s staff stopped responding.
As of late July 2025, the case stays energetic in civil courtroom, with Blige pushing for dismissal and Hylton standing agency on her claims.
