Earlier this 12 months, an alleged sufferer of Diddy’s actually swung for the fences when she tried to rope within the likes of Odell Beckham Jr. and comic Druski into her lawsuit towards the disgraced music icon, and although the jokes that adopted the Druski allegations had been fairly rattling hilarious, it was no laughing matter for the favored content material creator.
Now, months after Druski supplied proof to exhibit that he was broke and at dwelling on the time of the alleged assault of mentioned sufferer, Ashley Parham, a federal decide is siding with the social media celebrity stating that there doesn’t appear to be any proof for Druski to have been included within the lawsuit towards “The Diddler.”
In accordance with paperwork obtained by Advanced, a federal decide within the Northern District of California declared that there’s “no cheap factual foundation” for Parham and her authorized crew to proceed to allege that Druski had participated within the alleged gang-rape that she accused Diddy and others of taking part in. The courtroom even went as far as to order Parham’s counsel as to why they shouldn’t face sanctions for his or her “continued pursuit of claims towards Druski.” On the flipside, the courtroom denied Druski’s movement for sanctions for having his identify inexplicably included within the lawsuit towards Diddy.
Advanced studies:
Love Superstar? Get extra! Be a part of the Hip-Hop Wired E-newsletter
We care about your knowledge. See our privateness coverage.
Druski, recognized as “Doe 1” within the preliminary grievance, was added as a defendant on March 13, 2025, in an amended grievance filed by Parham and two further plaintiffs, Jane Doe and John Doe. The amended grievance explicitly alleged Druski participated in Parham’s gang rape. The Doe plaintiffs additionally allege they had been kidnapped, trafficked, and witnessed Parham’s assault, with Jane Doe reportedly sexually assaulted by one other defendant.
Following his inclusion, Druski moved for sanctions towards plaintiffs’ counsel below Rule 11 of the Federal Guidelines of Civil Process. Rule 11 requires attorneys to have a factual foundation for allegations and to conduct an inexpensive investigation earlier than submitting a lawsuit. Druski’s movement, filed on Might 9, 2025, contended that the claims towards him had been frivolous.
Fortunately for Druski, he was in a position to present paperwork showcasing simply how broke and residing at dwelling he was on the time of the alleged assault, which in flip helped get him off the hook of those disturbing allegations. Simply goes to indicate that generally being broke can save your life.
Now that the warmth has been positioned on the accuser and her authorized crew, it will likely be attention-grabbing to see how they attempt to spin this improvement once they need to return to courtroom with an evidence subsequent month.
Consequently, plaintiffs’ counsel has been ordered to indicate trigger by September 9, 2025, why their representations a few factual foundation for naming Druski don’t warrant sanctions, doubtlessly within the type of dismissal or attorneys’ charges. As a substitute of risking all that, the plaintiffs might as a substitute simply select to voluntarily dismiss him from the lawsuit.
Appears to be like like they’ve gotten themselves into fairly a pickle.
What do y’all take into consideration this newest improvement in Druski being pulled into the Diddy drama? Tell us within the feedback part under.
