Druski was cleared of involvement in a 2018 assault case tied to Diddy after a decide questioned why attorneys stored him within the go well with.
Druski scored a authorized win in a high-profile sexual assault lawsuit tied to Diddy, after a federal decide warned the plaintiff’s attorneys they may very well be penalized for persevering with to pursue claims in opposition to the comic regardless of overwhelming proof he wasn’t there.
The lawsuit, filed by Ashley Parham, accuses Diddy and a number of other others of a violent gang rape at a 2018 social gathering in Orinda, California.
Parham alleges Druski lined her in child oil or lubricant and used her physique “like a slip and slide” throughout the assault. She additionally claims Diddy recorded the assault and threatened her afterward.
Druski, who was not a part of the leisure business on the time, has denied any involvement.
On Tuesday (August 19), U.S. District Choose Rita F. Lin dominated that whereas attorneys had some foundation to call Druski within the amended criticism filed in March 2025, their refusal to drop him after clear-cut proof emerged might result in sanctions.
His authorized workforce submitted telephone and financial institution data exhibiting he was in Georgia on March 23, 2018 — the night time of the alleged assault. His debit card was used within the Atlanta space and all telephone exercise originated from Georgia that day.
Regardless of the documentation, Parham’s attorneys instructed the courtroom in July they’d “no want to dismiss” Druski from the case.
Choose Lin stated that the stance “seems to lack any affordable foundation” in gentle of the proof and ordered the attorneys to clarify why they shouldn’t face sanctions.
The courtroom gave the authorized workforce till September 9 to justify their actions or voluntarily take away Druski from the lawsuit. Failing to take action might lead to dismissal of the claims in opposition to him and a attainable order to pay his authorized charges.
Druski beforehand referred to as the accusations “fabricated lies” and stated, “I’ve by no means met any of the people concerned. I used to be not in California on the time of the alleged incident.”
The unique criticism additionally named Odell Beckham Jr., who additionally denied any involvement.
Parham’s authorized illustration is being led by legal professional Ariel Mitchell, who can be dealing with separate authorized bother.
Diddy has filed a $100 million defamation lawsuit in opposition to Mitchell and Newsmax, accusing them of spreading false and malicious claims to wreck his repute.
Associated
