Simply once you thought that key components faraway from Drake’s lawsuit reporting was a factor, press your brakes. Drizzy’s authorized battle with Common Music Group (UMG) over his defamation claims relating to Kendrick Lamar’s tune “Not Like Us” simply took a dramatic flip.
Get this: in a letter filed on February 24, Drake’s legal professional, Michael J. Gottlieb, strongly opposed UMG’s request to delay the pre-trial convention scheduled for April 2. The lawsuit facilities on accusations that the tune, which Drake claims comprises defamatory lyrics, was intentionally promoted by UMG in ways in which triggered vital hurt to his fame.
The guts of the dispute lies in UMG’s try to push again proceedings by requesting a ruling on its movement to dismiss the case due by March 17. The corporate argues that Drake is getting ready to revise a few of his allegations. Nonetheless, Gottlieb swiftly rejected this assertion, emphasizing that the lawsuit revolves round a factual problem that will not change the case’s core, even when revised.
Right here’s what you must know. Gottlieb’s letter highlights the urgency of shifting ahead, citing Kendrick’s efficiency on the Tremendous Bowl as an essential issue that UMG’s delay ways mustn’t overshadow. His crew insists that the pre-trial convention proceed as scheduled and that discovery ought to start promptly. UMG, nonetheless, argues that discovery is untimely given the pending movement to dismiss. Wager they do assume that.
As you in all probability heard, the lawsuit claims that UMG has been complicit in turning “Not Like Us” right into a viral sensation regardless of its alleged defamatory content material. Drake accuses the tune’s lyrics of falsely portraying him as a pedophile and inciting violent hatred towards him. He additional claims that UMG used illegal strategies to spice up the tune’s success, together with manipulating streaming and radio play numbers to offer it better attain.
Right here’s what’s essential, at the very least to Drake and his supporters. The authorized filings underscore the intense penalties of those actions, referencing the wave of on-line hate speech he has confronted, which he attributes to the tune’s defamatory lyrics. He additionally factors to a capturing incident at his Toronto dwelling shortly after the tune’s launch, which left a safety guard injured, in addition to a number of trespassing incidents that adopted. In accordance with Drake, UMG is accountable for the fallout, and any additional delay will solely exacerbate the hurt triggered.
That half.
Because the authorized battle continues, Drake’s crew stays adamant that justice should be served with out additional postponement, significantly because the repercussions of UMG’s actions proceed to have an effect on his life and profession.
Proper to a speedy trial. That applies to civil circumstances too. FYI.
