Chris Brown is going through a lawsuit in Los Angeles after a lady accused him of publicly humiliating her by reposting a manipulated video of her with ominous music and a mugshot from a wrongful arrest.
Angela Reliford, who makes use of the Instagram deal with chrisbrownzwife777, filed the criticism alleging invasion of privateness and false mild, per In Contact.
Based on the lawsuit, Chris Brown shared a closely edited video of her final July that included what she described as “ominous, ‘satan’ music” and “false captions suggesting that [Reliford] had meant hurt to Chris and his dancers.”
The video, which Reliford claims was altered from its authentic kind, options her talking about an incident involving certainly one of Brown’s backup dancers.
She says within the footage, “Man, wait til I get my cash proper. If I gotta be a part of a gang, if I gotta do some mob s### I don’t care.”
She additionally makes disturbing feedback about committing violence, together with, “The place can I legally kill? As a result of I’m coming for you. As quickly as I can. May be twenty years from now.”
“I’m not tryna be imply in any respect,” Chris Brown captioned his since-deleted publish. “However this s### is frightening!”
Chris Brown Stalker threatening his dancers particularly Taylor… beef up safety. pic.twitter.com/vwJUHzlY1M
— Drummond (@Lisa_JA876) July 9, 2024
Reliford says Brown reposted the video final July to his huge social media viewers “with out verifying its authenticity,” which she claims led to “substantial popularity hurt, public ridicule, and emotional misery.”
She additionally says she acquired threats and harassment after the video went reside.
The lawsuit accuses Brown of performing with “reckless disregard for the reality” by amplifying the video to his hundreds of thousands of followers and portraying her as “harmful and unstable.”
Reliford Claimed She Tried To Serve Chris Brown With Lawsuit For Months
Reliford has been vocal about her grievances with Brown since January when she accused him on Instagram of launching a smear marketing campaign. She later claimed she had been making an attempt to serve him with authorized papers since January 21.
Nevertheless, she seemingly modified course in April, alleging Brown had been leaving “breadcrumbs” on-line, which she interpreted as refined messages directed at her.
“I noticed the indicators. The synchronicities. The winks,” Reliford wrote. The ladies in your movies dressed like me, standing in the identical spots I stood, sporting what I wore. The timing was too particular to be coincidence. It felt such as you had been displaying love in your individual method.”
She added, “I’m not chasing you. I’m simply making an attempt to grasp what occurred. As a result of no matter this was… it modified every thing.”
As of now, Brown has not publicly responded to the lawsuit.
