One other day, one other lawsuit. Nick Cannon is going through a authorized battle this time after Viacom filed a lawsuit accusing Zeus Community of copying its iconic collection Wild ’N Out for his or her new present Dangerous vs. Wild. Viacom claims Zeus deliberately lifted key components from Wild ’N Out, together with the format, set design, and superstar appearances, with out creating unique content material.
First, have a look at the trailer for Dangerous vs. Wild and put issues into context …
Get this: Viacom’s legal professional, George W. Kroup, said, “Zeus deliberately copied Wild ‘N Out when growing Dangerous vs. Wild, totally conscious it was infringing on Viacom’s mental property.” He additional argued that Cannon’s involvement with Zeus — particularly given his lengthy historical past because the host of Wild ’N Out — strengthens their declare that the community is attempting to revenue off a longtime model.
The lawsuit lists quite a few similarities between the 2 exhibits, together with the reside viewers format, DJ-led scoring, superstar visitor appearances, and championship prizes — all logos of Wild ’N Out, in keeping with Viacom. The corporate argues that Dangerous vs. Wild is an imitation and a near-exact duplicate of its hit collection.
One other level of rivalry is Cannon’s participation within the rival present. Viacom claims that internet hosting Dangerous vs. Wild breaches Cannon’s contract, prohibiting him from engaged on exhibits that compete with or mirror Wild ’N Out. The lawsuit accuses Zeus of attractive Cannon to interrupt his contract by producing the competing present.
Moreover, Viacom alleges that Zeus marketed Dangerous vs. Wild as a hyper-charged model of Wild ’N Out, selling it as “Wild ’N Out on steroids.” Viacom additionally takes situation with the specific content material and controversial episodes, such because the “Lightskin vs. Darkskin” phase, which they argue perpetuates dangerous stereotypes and tarnishes the fame of Wild ’N Out.
The lawsuit targets Cannon and several other former Wild ’N Out forged members who now work on Dangerous vs. Wild, claiming their involvement confuses audiences into pondering the 2 exhibits are linked.
Viacom is looking for a everlasting injunction to cease the manufacturing and distribution of Dangerous vs. Wild, together with monetary damages, together with treble damages for willful copyright infringement, a whole give up of earnings, and authorized charges.
